Interleague play starts next weekend, and it’s probably safe to say that the NL West and Central will probably get their butts beat this year, while three or four of the NL East teams actually have the chance to come out pretty well and not made to look completely foolish by loaded AL line-ups. The problem with interleague every year is the uneven balance regarding which teams play each other, and it’s not exactly making Braves 3rd baseman Chipper Jones happy, particularly because the 1st place Braves will have to take on the Red Sox as a home-and-home. The Mets have to do the same thing with the Yankees, but the Phillies get a chance to beat up on the Blue Jays and Royals.
“Is it fun? Yeah. It’s fun playing in new cities. It’s fun playing in front of new crowds, it’s fun playing new teams,” Jones said. “What’s not fun is when they’re all contenders and your competition doesn’t have to play the same competition you do.”
What Jones most dislikes is the recently added wrinkle that requires teams to play so-called regional rivals in home-and-home series each season, such as Braves-Red Sox, Yankees-Mets and Angels-Dodgers.
“It’s a factor (in the pennant race),” Jones said. “We play Boston six times, and they’ve got the best record in the American League. We play the top three teams in the toughest division in baseball (the AL Central). We, without a doubt, have the toughest schedule in baseball, bar none. You don’t play in our division and play the interleague schedule we play and not say we don’t have the toughest schedule.”
The problem is the whole “geographic rivalry” concept, which is a handy-dandy way to sell tickets with teams in close markets: Angels-Dodgers, Yankees-Mets, Cubs-White Sox, Giants-Athletics, and so on. Atlanta gets linked up with the Red Sox due more to history, if Wikipedia’s any guess — the Braves originally being Boston’s NL team, but that still doesn’t mean it’s fair. Jones has a point, but it’s not gonna work running up against obvious commerce — the whole reason interleague works is because fans of those two-team markets can have superiority contests each year. Yankees-Mets? Cubs-White Sox? Dodgers-Angels? Look forward to those just about every year, and so do their fans and some of those in other obvious rivalries.
Fair only applies when it doesn’t affect the bottom line, Mr. Jones. No matter what the interleague schedule, given the state of the NL as compared to the AL in recent years, all of the NL teams should just be prepared to take their beatings and like it, unless you happen to be in the NL East — you have half a chance. The amusing part is that when interleague started, I thought the NL would get the best of it; they were so used to playing with pitchers hitting that adding another bat off the bench would help them, and AL teams would have to put their DHs in the field (more often than not, at 1B or in the outfield) — but that really has not been the case the last couple of years.
Chipper Jones rips interleague rivalry games [MSNBC]
Interleague play [Wikipedia]
Peek at the Week: Interleague Begins [MLB.com]
Filed under: MLB, Uncategorized | Tagged: American League, Interleague, National League
Like the new webpage….looks good…I linked up your new site on my blog
Thanks, Stiles — and I like the interview with Brennan. Nice job.
Yeah, love the new design, its *so* you S2N. WordPress is a far far better thing then blogger IMO.
I love that you think the Phillies could beat up on anyone.
RUTS, we’re talking about the Blue Jays (Halladay has appendicitis, B.J. Ryan gone for the season) and the Devil Rays. If the Phillies lose either one of these series…well, I just don’t know what to say.
[...] Red Sox vs. Braves Is A Geographic Rivalry? [image] Interleague play starts next weekend, and it’s probably safe to say that the NL West and Central will […] [...]
Sox are going to roll over the Braves. Jones needs to quit crying. He should try playing the Yankees 19 times a year.
Red Sox vs. Braves? For historical reasons only, and has no real meaning.
So, what’s the *real* natural rival for the Red Sox. It’s so obvious that it makes no sense why MLB hasn’t figured it out.
Red Sox vs. Cubs!
Bragging rights for who has the best ballpark.
Hello!
And it’s the Red Sox, BTW.
It’s not a “geographic rivalry” and has never been called that by anyone in MLB or, until you, out of it. It’s a “traditional rivalry,” the tradition allegedly coming from the fact that both teams once called Boston home.
Unfortunately, this voids your entire post. Thanks for wasting everyone’s time.
Either way, it’s a rivalry based on nothing. If you’re going to go like that then you could have the Giants or Dodgers play the Yankees as a rivalry, or Oakland and Philly. Those aren’t going to happen.
G’day!
As an Australia-based Blue Jays fan, I found your blog on google and read a few of your other Blue Jays posts.
I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.